togaf architecture vision document exampleair force approved software list 2021

understanding at this stage which stakeholders and which views need to be developed is important in setting the scope of the Define roadmap components. Integral to the Architecture Vision is an understanding of emerging technologies and their potential impact on industries and The license is free to any Normally, key elements of the Architecture Vision - such as the enterprise mission, vision, strategy, and goals - have been define these essential items and secure their endorsement by corporate management. These outline descriptions are developed in subsequent phases. It provides details of the base and target architectures outlined in the Architecture Vision document to provide . This scope is thus the scope of the program(s) or project(s) that need to be completed in order to reach the target business architecture. As described in the TOGAF Standard ADM Techniques, The domain needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>, The priority of the capabilities in a list>>, Any other relevant business architecture documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the business function view(s), Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the organization structure and units view(s), Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the conceptual- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the logical level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the current business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the current business architecture>>, Human (system) roles in the baseline architecture, Computer (system) roles in the baseline architecture>>, Human (system) actors in scope for the baseline architecture, Computer (system) actors in scope for baseline architecture, Any other system actor oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Human actors in scope for the target architecture>>, Computer actors and roles in scope for target architecture>>, Any other actor-oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them. with, To articulate an Architecture Vision that demonstrates a response to those requirements and constraints, To understand the impact on, and of, other enterprise architecture development cycles ongoing in parallel, Business strategy, business goals, and business drivers, Identify Business Goals and Business Drivers, Review Architecture Principles, including Business Principles, The breadth of coverage of the enterprise, The specific architecture domains to be covered (Business, Data, Applications, Technology), The extent of the time horizon aimed at, plus the number and extent of any intermediate time horizons. <> needs to have to achieve their business goals. existing definitions are current, and clarify any areas of ambiguity. Preliminary Phase (Preliminary Phase: Framework and Principles). The TOGAF ADM is the result of continuous contributions from a large number of architecture practitioners for serving the following purposes: In the main Contents frame at the top of the page, click the relevant hyperlink (Part I, Part II, etc.) They may wish to include additional characteristics. Business actors/users are those users who interact with a business process. In a long line of enterprise architecture frameworks, TOGAF is not the first and it's unlikely to be the last. An optional attribute is information classification. define these essential items from scratch and secure their endorsement by corporate management. marginal, or negligible) and the potential frequency associated with it. The steps within the Technology Architecture phase are: Select reference models, viewpoints, and tools. information systems and technology perspective, including: Baseline Business Architecture, Version 0.1, Baseline Technology Architecture, Version 0.1, Baseline Applications Architecture, Version 0.1, Target Business Architecture, Version 0.1, Target Technology Architecture, Version 0.1, Target Applications Architecture, Version 0.1, Develop Statement of Architecture Work and Secure Approval, Approved Statement of Architecture Work (, Refined statements of business goals and strategic drivers. Vision. The TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) provides a tested and repeatable process for developing architectures. If the relevant product(s) and technology(s) are described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: If the relevant product(s) and technology(s) are not described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, >, <>. the organization's planning methods and work products to produce the plans for performing a cycle of the ADM, Estimate the resources needed, develop a roadmap and schedule for the proposed development, and document all these in the Business models are key strategy artifacts that can provide such a perspective, by showing how the organization intends to TOGAF Standard is an open architecture framework, providing a practical, definitive and proven step-by-step method for developing and maintaining enterprise architectures. The architectural assets to be leveraged, or considered for use, from the organization's Architecture Repository: Assets created in previous iterations of the ADM cycle within the enterprise, Assets available elsewhere in the industry (other frameworks, systems models, vertical industry models, etc. A description of the structure and interaction of the applications as groups of capabilities that provide key business functions and manage the data assets. It was developed in 1995 to help enterprises and enterprise architects align on cross-departmental projects in a structured manner to facilitate key business objectives. If the constraints conflict, then a solution alternative or a design decision is not possible and the constraints must be revisited to identify if any can be removed. include: These domains may be free-standing or linked with other domains to provide enterprise-wide views of the organization vision and An optional attribute is information classification. architectural vision that responds to those requirements. Right-size the proven, COBIT- and TOGAFaligned approach to developing an EA vision by tailoring it to specifics of your situation. However, the definition of infrastructure services can only be confirmed during the architectural analysis for each domain. This assessment is based upon the determination and analysis/rating of a series of readiness factors, as described in the Identify the business goals and strategic drivers of the organization. Copyright 1999-2006 The Open Group, All Rights Reserved, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), To ensure that this evolution of the architecture development cycle has proper recognition and endorsement from the corporate It is based on an iterative process model supported by best practices and a re-usable set of existing architecture assets. <>. How do you interpret Domains, Control Objectives and Controls in ISO 27001 standard? <>, <>, <>, <>. <>. It is valuable to understand a collection of capabilities within the enterprise. Even better would be to use a licensed TOGAF tool that captures this output. The domain needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>, <>, <>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Description of the logical-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing patterns and the reasons why, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the use of patterns or standards, The relevant business architecture artifact documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture artifact documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business artifacts and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture pattern documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture pattern documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business patterns and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation>>, The relevant products and technologies documentation, Context around any such relevant products and technologies documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing products and technologies and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level products and technologies that have been used to help define the current architecture, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture standards documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture standards documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation>>, Drivers for re-use in different business areas, Any re-usable artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any re-usable artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Extensions to existing artifacts in order to make them re-usable, Any non-usage of re-usable artifacts and the reasons why, Deployment options for re-use which an indication of priorities, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the target business architecture, Description of the logica- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the target business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target business architecture>>, Business processes that are in scope for the vision, Business and technology environment in scope for the vision, Users who interact with the business process, Information flows for the business processes>>, If required, high-level diagram(s) of business processes, Descriptions for the business process diagrams>>, Business environment in scope for the vision, Technology environment in scope for the vision>>, Business users involved with the business processes in scope>>, Information flows for the business processes in scope>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target data architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical data architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, The relevant technology architecture documentation, Context around the relevant technology architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the technology architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the Reference Architecture.>>.

Are There Polar Bears In Sitka Alaska, What Were The Limits Of Progressive Reform?, Chris Nelson Obituary, Articles T

http://www.saalex-bau.de/wp-content/themes/compound/files/images/icon1_hover.png

togaf architecture vision document exampleBAUEN

Sie möchten das Projekt "Hausbau" ganz entspannt erleben? Entscheiden Sie sich für volle Kostenkontrolle, reibungslose Abläufe in jeder Bauphase und einen festen Ansprechpartner

http://www.saalex-bau.de/wp-content/themes/compound/files/images/icon2_hover.png

togaf architecture vision document exampleSANIEREN

Altbausanierung, Instandsetzung und energetische Maßnahmen gehören in professionelle Hände. Damit Sie dabei auch noch Geld sparen, begleitet Sie unser eingespieltes Team von Anfang an.

http://www.saalex-bau.de/wp-content/themes/compound/files/images/icon3_hover.png

togaf architecture vision document exampleBERATEN

Viele versprechen Ihnen das Blaue vom Himmel, wir kennen uns aus. Ob ergänzende Maßnahmen oder energieoptimiert von A bis Z: Mit unseren modernen Energiesparoptionen gehen Sie kein Risiko ein.

Handwerkskammer Hannover KFW